I thought the article was being bias and liberal at the same time because they were talking about Obama not doing much to the drugs and wars. It felt more negative then positive to me they were against Obama more than with him. " President Obama’s flat-out refusal to engage in open and honest discussions on an issue of paramount concern to South American leaders—namely our nation’s appetite for cocaine." He didn't take actions into his hands about the situation going on in pressure conservation. Anti-business because there not with Obama everything they'd said was negative to him in away." He refused to even discuss the subjects of decriminalization or legalization), the president demonstrated that he is either completely out of touch with reality or has no respect for the intelligence of the other leaders of the Americas." This proves that they had so much negatively to say to Obama nothing good about this article. It was all bias in the beginning. The whole article is anti-business because this summarize the article its basely telling why didn't our president take action to defuse the drugs and war in our country while others are doing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment